This Week In Science! March 1st-8th, 2013! Science Rules!

Like any good scientist I love true science and hate lies masquerading as science.  There is ample evidence of bias and inaccuracy in almost every realm of modern scientific inquiry.  These flaws go back decades if not centuries and therefore many of the flawed policies and dangerous assumptions plaguing civilization are now rooted as much in bad science as they are in bad religion, bad politics, and bad economics.

Almost every great scientific discovery throughout history was dismissed by the scientific establishment at the time.  The modern world is no different from the past in this regard.  In modern times corporate, bankster, political, military, and egotistical interests have skewed science and spread fallacies to an unprecedented extent.

Fortunately, we have The Internet which is the most powerful tool ever available for exposing corruption and deception.  Right now a new group of scientists that prove the Establishment is smoking crack has emerged via the internet, but unfortunately most scientists are blinded by tradition.

Many university and corporate scientists treat peer reviewed scientific journals like religious texts.    After all, if it's "peer reviewed" it must be the best, latest, and most reputable science, right?  Wrong.  In recent (and not so recent years) countless reputable doctors, scientists, and experts have gone against the grain and spoken out against the flaws in their respective fields. Blindly accepting peer reviewed information is not science.  It's a circle jerk.

One book which I found formative in my growing awareness of this realization is "Overdosed America: The Broken Promise of American Medicine" by John Abramson, MD.  In the book Abramson irrefutably shows how tortured and false the "science" modern medicine is built upon has become.  He exposes numerous instances of biased and falsified information regarding the most profitable pharmaceuticals in the most "reputable" medical journals.

I was supposed to become an MD and got so far as my first month in medical school before realizing that establishment medicine cared much more about profit than health and was more concerned about managing chronic conditions than it was with actually making sick people well again.

If greed, bias, and falsehood has even overrun medical science, what makes you think any other field of inquiry is immune to the toxic corruption emanating from modern banking, politics, media and business? 

Would you professional scientists PLEASE get off your asses and do your own research, express your own hypotheses, and expose the glaring faults in much that Establishment Science would have us believe?  Our lives and our planet depend on it.

May the following image offer you some guidance as you begin your quest...

If you disagree with anything in this image, prove me wrong.  Don't attack my character.  Don't dismiss me out of hand.  Don't cite some "reputable" institution or research you know nothing about.  Gather data from a multitude of sources, formulate your own hypothesis, do your own research, and seriously prove me wrong.  Otherwise, stop calling yourself a scientist or claiming you methods are scientific.  Regurgitating others' words is not science.  It's public relations.

Be a scientist, not a puppet.  Peace.